Our products are widely recognized and trusted by users and can meet continuously changing economic and social needs for Network Cable Extender,Cat5 Cable Extender,Kvm Over Ethernet,Hdmi Extender Lan,Hd Base T Extender.Welcome your visiting and any your inquires,sincerely hope we can have chance to cooperate with you and we can build up long well business relationship with you. The product will supply to all over the world, such asSlovakia ,Armenia ,Bhutan ,Georgia ,Florence ,When It produced, it making use of the world's major method for reliable operation, a low failure price, it appropriate for Jeddah shoppers choice. Our enterprise. s situated inside the national civilized cities, the website traffic is very hassle-free, unique geographical and financial circumstances. We pursue a "people-oriented, meticulous manufacturing, brainstorm, make brilliant" company philosophy. Strict good quality management, fantastic service, affordable cost in Jeddah is our stand around the premise of competitors. If needed, welcome to make contact with us by our web page or phone consultation, we will be delighted to serve you.
Wirecutter is supported by readers. When you make a purchase through a link on our website, we may receive a membership commission.
We are testing a new round of surge protectors, including
with
, This
with
. Please check back for the full update later.
your
guide
Share this comment
Any switchboard can add some extra outlets in the room, but it is important to find an outlet that does not make your electronic equipment susceptible to harmful electrical surges. We have spent more than 150 hours researching and testing surge protectors, and we are convinced
Provide the best combination of protection and number of sockets at a reasonable price. It can absorb ordinary household power surges (up to thousands of volts) and then bring it to your electronic equipment to prevent damage and fire. You don't have to doubt whether it is still working, because once the protection fails, it can safely cut off the power, so you know it's time to replace it.
In the test, the surge protector is one of the best protectors to prevent excess voltage from reaching its socket. Once the protection device wears out, it can also safely stop all power sources, and it has 12 AC power sockets as well as coaxial cables and telephone ports.
*At the time of publication, the price was
$55
.
If you want to use a surge protector for your home theater or office,
Is your best choice. It has a key automatic shutdown function, enough sockets (to power all gadgets), coaxial cable and telephone connectors. It provides great protection for the family
Fluctuations in electricity from other devices in your home or power company. In addition, it has a wide 8-foot cord and feels sturdy and sturdy.
advertising
The P12U2 can protect against power surges and any other devices we have tested, but in some cases, it can still provide power even if part of the protection is damaged. It has no phone and coaxial cable connection, but adds two USB charging ports.
$34
12 sockets
It has the automatic shutdown function required by our main selection, but the function will only be activated when one of the functions is activated
Failure occurs-if either of the other two parts is used up first, it will protect your expensive electronic equipment part. However, it has prominent LEDs to indicate wiring problems and has as many AC outlets as Tripp Lite's preferred products. In our tests, it works as hard as the Tripp Lite 12-Outlet to suppress surges, and its Joule rating is approximately 30% higher (which means it is designed to last longer, but this is only an estimate). Although it lacks our preferred phone and coaxial ports, it adds two USB ports so you don't have to sacrifice sockets to charge phones, tablets or other small devices. APC's short cable (6 feet) means that it is difficult for you to reach distant outlets, but we think it is long enough for most people.
The Power Air has six AC outlets and two 2.4-amp USB ports, providing a lot of protection in a compact design.
For light power sources (such as under a bedside table or coffee table),
It is a way to protect gadgets (such as phones, tablets or alarm clocks) from surges. It provides two USB ports and six AC power sockets in a circular package, which is smaller than a dinner plate. The USB port provides a total of 2.4 amps of current, which is enough to charge a smartphone or tablet at a high speed, or charge two low-speed devices. The circular socket layout allows it to be used with various plug sizes. Like the APC P12U2, it has a 6-foot cord, which is 2 feet shorter than the cord of the Tripp Lite 12 socket. Although the rated power is low (1,080 joules), the performance of Power Air in its service life is not as good as our main selection and runner-up, but its life may not be as much as that of large models.
Tripp Lite’s Protect It 3-Outlet SK30USB has an automatic shutdown function and provides almost the same surge protection as the full-size model. In addition, it has two 2.1 amp USB ports.
$23
This
Provide our favorite portability
, But provides more protection. It has an automatic shut-off mechanism, making it one of the few three power outlet options we have found, which will disconnect the power when the surge protector wears out. In addition to three AC power outlets, it is also equipped with two USB ports that can provide a total of 2.1 amperes of current. Compared with other small options we have tested, it performs well and can almost block the voltage of larger models. We will choose SK30USB to protect some small household appliances (for example, essential oil diffusers, Nintendo Switch docking stations and coffee grinders) and some smart phones, even when we travel with us.
Unless you have a high-end home theater, office or media equipment, this is too much lethality. It eliminates surges better than any model we have tried, including the price of surge eliminators. Times.
$125
Our preferred product will provide protection for most devices in most situations. but
Furthermore, it provides the best surge suppression capability of all the models we have tested, enough to reassure owners of high-end electronic products. It turns a 5,000 volt surge into 40 volts, thanks in part to shutting down the circuit, which turns off all power when a surge is detected. Compared with high-end series mode surge eliminators, the PST-8 actually passed fewer voltages in our tests, and the latter may cost hundreds of dollars. But ordinary equipment (such as computer monitors) will be well protected by one of our cheaper paddles, so this model is best for those who insist on providing extra protection for special precious equipment. In addition, it has a sturdy aluminum body and an 8-foot-long cord.
I have been a science reporter for more than four years, covering a wide range of topics from particle physics to satellite remote sensing. Since joining Wirecutter in 2017, I have been reporting
,
, And more.
In order to distinguish the facts from the facts about surge protectors, we approached experts in multiple fields when writing the original version of this guide. We talked
He is a veteran with 30 years of experience in the utility industry and a senior vice president of the industry association (American Public Power Association) to learn about grid and utility-scale surge protection. We emailed
He is an insurance professional who has been in the industry since the 1960s and has received advice on the role of homeowners and tenants’ insurance policies in protecting your technology investments.
In addition, since 2016, we have invited Lee Johnson, an electrical engineer with more than 10 years of experience in electronic product design and testing, to conduct four rounds of testing on our preferred products.
Surge protectors provide more than just additional outlets. It is above all a safety device-a relatively cheap method of protecting expensive electronic products. There is no reason for anyone to leave the office, the study or home theater is unprotected, or hang on a worn-out surge protector.
Yes, that's right: surge protectors will not last forever. Most estimates set the average life span of a surge protector at three to five years. Also, if your house has frequent power outages or outages, you may want to
Like
. If you move as frequently as I do every two years, a good rule of thumb is to get rid of the old surge protector when packing and replace it when you move to a new location. If you have a cheap basic power strip (or
Plug it directly into a wall outlet), it probably never had a worthwhile surge protection function in the first place. No judgment-I once owned the switchboard my parents bought for the first house. But you should replace these substandard options as soon as possible and thank them for not
Every time there is a power surge, the internal surge protection components will wear out more, and there is actually no way to know how much protection is left. Even if the protective measures have long since disappeared, many inexpensive models continue to supply power to their sockets. This is why we recommend looking for a surge protector with an automatic shutdown function, which prevents the device from transmitting power when the protector wears out.
Most estimates set the average life span of a surge protector at three to five years.
Although surge protectors are not very useful in protecting your property from direct lightning strikes, they are
In any case, they can help solve the more common electrical surges that are generated inside a house or building. They can also protect your utility company from sudden shocks and are especially worth a try in areas with unreliable power grids.
If you never want to replace the surge protector, you can look for high-end products.
Or a hybrid surge protector that can be used continuously indefinitely. But their price can easily soar to 10 times the price of our main pick and runner-up, so for most people, they are an impractical choice.
Finally, if you want to protect equipment that may be damaged by a sudden power failure, hard drives that are vulnerable to data corruption, or important equipment that will never shut down (such as
To treat sleep apnea), you shouldn’t use a surge protector at all. Instead, you need uninterruptible power supplies (UPS), most of which have built-in surge protection. (If this describes you, please read our guide
)
We started our research by aggregating the models by scanning the best search results on the websites of retailers such as Amazon, Google Shopping, Walmart and Home Depot, and well-known brands such as Tripp Lite, Accell, and Belkin.
As we did in previous editions of this guide, we considered the different ways people use surge protectors. For our preferred product, we know that we want some heavy-duty products to be used with home theater equipment and game consoles in the living room (or computer equipment in the office). We also studied small devices designed for kitchen sockets or bedside tables, as well as series and hybrid models for people who need the highest surge protection capabilities.
We look for models with several specific characteristics in each subcategory, including the following characteristics:
Screening candidates through these requirements allows us to obtain a short list of nine models to test against our existing picks:
In the next phase of the report, we tested some of the claims made by each company. Any surge protector
Products that have been rated will be stamped on their main body or printed with their surge protection function on their packaging. Although it is easy to exclude the worst models through research alone, we conducted face-to-face comparisons to verify which models provide the best protection.
In the United States, AC power sockets can nominally provide 120 volts of electricity, but because the design of the power brick conforms to the 240 volt standard used internationally, most electronic devices can handle more voltages. In our test, we applied a 5,000 volt surge to each surge protector and measured the current to any connected equipment.
Senior electrical engineer Lee Johnson set up our test parameters. He attaches each model to a
Generate surges along 200 to 5,000 volts and generate surges in 100 volt increments
-Ground (LG), Ground (LN) and Ground (NG)-and record the output results, which will be transmitted to any equipment inserted into the surge protector. Subsequently, he conducted five consecutive 5,000-volt surges and averaged the results. He recorded the output (the lower the better, because this means that the surge protector will block more power in the device) for all three wiring lines. According to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, no family will experience a power surge.
, And most are not even close. The main exception is a direct lightning strike, but considering that the bolt means upward
, No household surge protector can protect your TV from one of them.
In 2016 and 2017, Johnson dissected each surge protector to evaluate its components. He compared the thickness of the wires, the size and layout of the wires
, Is there
or
Be incorporated into the design, as well as the overall construction quality. For well-known brands that sell surge protectors (prices between US$15 and US$50), the guts are so similar that no useful information is obtained from the anatomy, so we have not dismantled the models that have been tested since then.
To further illustrate the importance of using a surge protector, Johnson applied a 5,000 volt surge to the (very old) Dell LCD monitor, with or without protection. After the protected hit, the monitor turns on and displays the image without problems. In contrast, when he leaked 5,000 volts directly into the unprotected display, it immediately cried in pain and never turned it on again.
In the latest test in 2020, we did not test any series mode or hybrid surge protectors because we think they are too large for most people. In past tests, we found our early version
In some respects, it showed the same or better results at a lower price. However, when we tested several models before (
), we compare them with the relatively cheap and MOV-based general-purpose products, and put them at the same speed. We applied various surges from 160 volts to 5,000 volts to each surge to observe their response, and then performed another 5 shocks at 5,000 volts to average. We also disassembled each unit and found a similar design and construction, but there are only small differences between the visible components.
We have tested dozens of surge protectors and are confident
It is the best choice for use with typical living room or office equipment. It provides all the safety features you need, ample sockets, excellent surge protection performance, and its manufacturing quality is significantly better than other devices we have tested.
The Tripp Lite 12 socket has an automatic shutdown function. When the device is worn out, it will permanently turn off the power to the device and can no longer prevent power surges. Unlike most surge protectors, which will continue to power electronic devices even after the protection disappears, our choice is safe and trustworthy, because you know that if power is still provided, it still has some protection features. In addition to its automatic shutdown function, the device also has two small LED indicators: one to tell you when the surge protection is working, and the other to let you know if there is a short circuit, a blown fuse, or a wiring problem that requires intervention. From an electrician.
When we send a 5,000 volt surge through the Tripp Lite 12 socket, its suppression capability is the same as any MOV-based surge protector we tested. In our test, its average allowable pass voltage (the remaining amount of surge through the device) was 207 volts. This is much lower than UL's
score.
Please note that the voltage of each surge protector we tested is below 400 volts.
. The discount unit passed a voltage of up to 517 volts on the LN leg, and did not provide any protection on the other two legs. If you care about actual surge protection, please don't buy a general-purpose surge protector.
Tripp Lite’s 12 AC power outlets should be enough for most people's needs-enough
, A
, with
. You can find surge protectors with more than 12 sockets (for example, Tripp Lite makes a
), but they are usually too large to be used at home, and lack peripheral ports such as USB, telephone, and coaxial connectors.
The Tripp Lite 12 socket also has dual coaxial connectors, so you can connect a cable box and three phone ports. (versus
Connection, phone ports do not support high-speed Internet, so although these ports can be used to protect fixed phones, they cannot be used to protect network equipment from damage. ) If you need a coaxial or telephone connection to set up a media center with equipment, these additional ports are great. Just like AC power outlets, power is also supplied through them, so they may be affected
. For example, power spikes caused by improperly grounded cables (uncommon) can damage unprotected cable boxes. Unlike our runner-up and light aircraft, the Tripp Lite 12 socket does not have any USB ports. But since this type of surge protector is usually placed out of reach (behind a sofa, desk or TV cabinet) and is designed for more heavy-duty purposes, we think that the USB port is not that important.
The appearance of the unit matches the sturdy utilitarian shell, showing its outstanding performance. With ordinary power strips (or even
The surge protector we considered in the last round of testing), its veneer seems to withstand most minor scratches and abrasions. It is compact enough to slide under a bed or entertainment center, and a set of holes on the back gives you the option to mount it on the skirting board. Its 8 feet thick rubber cord is 2 feet longer than 2 feet.
, Which makes it more convenient to run under the bookshelves and sofas. And unlike our other select products, it has
It is an ideal choice for narrow spaces. Tripp Lite provides a limited lifetime warranty to prevent any defects or malfunctions during the life of the product, but please note that the surge protector will not eventually wear out as designed, this is not a defect.
The Joule rating of the Tripp Lite 12 socket is about one-third lower than our Joule rating
: 2,880 vs. 4,320 Joules. The Joule rating tells you how much a surge protector can withstand before it breaks, so our preferred product may not last as long as the APC model. But since this rating is an estimate, and our choice is still higher than many other models we considered, we decided to give more weight to the numbers that can be tested.
Another problem with the Tripp Lite 12 socket is that its space is a bit tight. It has four well-spaced sockets for large power bricks, but the eight sockets in a single row quickly become overcrowded, especially when the plugs are bulky. If some sockets are on the other side of the body, or the device has rotating sockets (such as
. However, the good overall performance of the unit outweighs this subtle defect.
If it is our first choice,
, Not available, please get 12 sockets
. It has as many AC outlets as the AC outlets we chose, the average output and pass voltage recorded in our tests are about the same, and its Joule rating is almost twice that. Like the Tripp Lite 12 socket, it has a lifetime warranty. It is also as sturdy as Tripp Lite, and we hope its socket location is better. However, several major shortcomings (ie poor automatic shutdown function and short power cord) prevent us from becoming the preferred product.
The automatic shutdown function of the P12U2 (to prevent it from being unable to power electronic equipment after losing its protection function) will only appear when the main (LN) branch is worn out. This means that if any of the other two branches (LG or NG) fails first, it will continue to power your equipment, and they may suffer damage in the event of a power surge. There is a silver lining that the P12U2 has two notification LED indicators, embedded in a long transparent plastic strip that extends across its entire body and can clearly indicate when it is no longer able to provide protection, or whether it is present Short circuit or wiring fault. This is the only model we considered in this design. The notification lights of most other surge protectors are the size of a needle.
Like our first choice, P12U2 has 12 AC power sockets. It lacks telephone and coaxial connectors. If you want to connect landline telephones, dial-up Internet access or cable boxes through surge protectors, it may cause inconvenience. However, for everyone else, this is not a big loss. Unlike the Tripp Lite 12 socket, the P12U2 has two USB ports. These are not super useful for media centers, but they are good choices for home offices or any place with devices that can be charged directly via USB.
When we use 5,000 volts to power the P12U2, it prevents surges and our first choice, its penetration voltage is only 205.2 volts-much lower than 330 volts
Rate this surge protector.
Like the Tripp Lite 12 socket, the P12U2 has a limited lifetime warranty to cover all defects. It has a power rating of 4,320 Joules, which is about 50% higher than our preferred power rating (although it can equally protect your equipment from any single shock). As we are explaining
As shown above, a higher Joule rating means that the APC model should last longer, but the rating is only an estimate, and it is impossible to know exactly how long the "longer time" will last.
The P12U2's wire is only 6 feet long, but we think that in most cases, it is still very long. It has four sockets with larger spacing, which can be plugged in larger plugs, such as our first choice, but the other eight sockets are divided into two rows, four in each row, which provides you with more space. Moreover, in terms of build quality, the APC P12U2 is as good as the Tripp Lite 12 socket.
we like
Even if the house looks like a UFO, it is also suitable for light-load use around the house. Like our preferred product, Power Air will shut down safely if it fails to protect your electronic equipment, so you will know when you need to replace it. The low design (approximately 7¼ inches in diameter and 2 inches in height) is perfect for bedside tables or coffee tables with limited space. Despite its small size, Power Air is able to suppress the most common surge in most large models.
Power Air's automatic shutdown function will permanently power off the device at the end of its useful life, and will no longer be able to suppress power surges. This is the safest way to ensure that the surge protector is actually protecting the electronic equipment. Even if you don’t use it to power expensive equipment, you can still use it as one of our main selection products, but it’s good to make you more worry-free.
The number of AC power outlets for this device is half of our top and second place, but we think six are enough for light-duty surge protectors. In addition, it has two USB ports, the total current of these ports is 2.4A, while the old model USB port is 2.1A.
—Therefore, it provides faster charging speeds for most smartphones and tablets. Even if you insert
, One
with
-The appearance of a well-equipped bedside table-You still have several sockets to choose from.
In our test, when we tested against a surge of 5,000 volts, Power Air could only pass a voltage of 268.8 volts on average. Although their results are close to 200 volts, they are in the same category as our first choice. However, its service life may not be very long. Its rated consumption is only 1,080 joules, which is not lower than the joule ratings of Tripp Lite (2,880) and APC (4,320) models. Even though our other options have a lifetime warranty, the Power Air's five-year warranty is appropriate considering that the life of the surge protector should be maintained approximately, because most protection circuits will wear out within three to five years.
Power Air is sleek and compact, with a flat shape, which can easily slide under the coffee table. Its 6-foot-long cord is thick, flexible and durable, and its outlet leaves enough space around the top of the device so that you can fully access all the wires. Finally, its blue and green LEDs (respectively telling you whether the device is powered on and protective) will be clearly marked and clearly visible on the top.
If you want something that provides strong protection in a small package (for example, powering a few devices and a few smartphones on the kitchen counter), please buy
. In our complete guide
, We recommend that you use models with up to four AC power outlets and up to two USB ports. However, although most of the switchboards only provide low-level protection against power surges, in our tests, SK30USB has almost the same protection capabilities as large competitors.
In addition to the three AC ports on the front, the SK30USB also has two 2.1 amp USB ports. It also has an auto-shutdown function, making it one of the few small portable surge protectors we found with this function.
In our test, the allowable pass voltage of SK30USB (291.8 volts) is at the same level as the allowable voltage we obtained from the best choice and second place (allowed to pass 206.8 and 205.2 volts, respectively), and is much lower than its 330 volt UL score. Although its life expectancy is shorter than our remaining options (rated at 540 joules, while our other options are thousands of joules), it has a lifetime warranty, which is a great deal for such a cheap device. Impressive.
As for the appearance, SK30USB is made of smooth plastic and has a smooth, streamlined design. Even if it protrudes about an inch from the wall when inserted, it blends seamlessly into the background. Like
, There is a clearly visible plastic band on the top of the device, which lights up to show that its protective function is working (on the downside, this light may be annoying in the bedroom when you try to sleep). It has a three-pin plug and a plastic rod that can be inserted into the bottom hole of the second outlet to ensure a tight connection. If you use SK30USB at home, it also has a screw, you can plug it directly into the wall (instead of the screw in the middle of the wall socket board) for a more sturdy installation, but we don’t recommend you to do this if you plan to use this machine To travel. The spacing between the AC and USB ports is very small, but this can be expected on such a small unit.
Most people don’t need this level of protection, but
Provides the strongest surge protection among dozens of models we tested, even better than high-end
It cost hundreds of dollars. Even though our tests have shown that general-purpose equipment such as computer monitors can survive surges when protected by our cheaper options, in some cases, it costs more to increase the level of protection. The money is still worth it. Among the five numbers. If you want complete peace of mind, no matter what situation you encounter, there is no more affordable method than PST-8.
In our tests, the PST-8 repeatedly allowed 40 volts out of a 5,000 volt surge to pass through its eight sockets. Furman no longer relies on the standard MOV to absorb the entire surge, but adds additional protection: After the surge exceeds 137 volts, the entire device will be shut down to protect itself and all connected devices (open and close the device to reset it) . Any surge that passes before the shutdown will pass through a series of capacitors and a large inductor to filter out the excess power. Large-scale MOVs are similar to MOVs in cheaper units, only sacrificing part of themselves as a last resort.
stage. According to Furman, this is why you can't find the Joule rating listed for the PST-8-since other surge protectors only rely on MOVs to absorb energy, this is not an apple-to-apple comparison.
Furman Power Station 8 (PST-8) provides the most powerful surge protection among dozens of models we tested, even surpassing the expensive high-end series-mode surge protectors that cost hundreds of dollars.
The company also claims that since its launch, the circuit design of the PST-8 has resulted in its repair and replacement rate of less than 0.005%. In other words, few customers need to repair or replace their equipment, Furman said, in all cases, the damage is physical damage (dents, cracks, or broken parts), not internal failures. Considering that this setting effectively suppressed our test surge, we have every reason to believe that in the price range of less than $50, PST-8 can provide longer protection time than standard surge protectors.
However, this improved protection measures not only pay a price, but also pay a price. The PST-8 has only eight AC power outlets in total, plus two phone ports and two coaxial connectors. When you try to power a large number of electronic devices, you may feel a headache. Its layout also has some shortcomings. Only two AC power outlets are properly spaced to accommodate a larger plug. Finally, its three-year warranty (
, But only if you start from
) Is one of the shortest models we have seen, which is disappointing because we expect its surge protection function to last longer than cheaper models. (According to Furman's introduction, these devices are often used by touring musicians, so they are more wear and tear than home surge protectors, so the warranty period is relatively short.)
However, if the price of your device is above average, then these trade-offs make sense. Although PST-8 is not very convenient, it will provide better protection than our other pickaxes. Its overall structure is sturdy, with an aluminum body and an 8-foot-long rope.
we like
, And in addition to two USB-A ports and six AC power outlets, it also provides a fast charging USB-C PD port. But this is one of the most expensive and least protective options we’ve tested, but it’s not the case
Listed.
Almost with
, But in our test, its allowable pass voltage is poor, compared with the SK30USB's 291.8 volts, which allows 350 volts to pass.
So far, it is the worst performer in our latest round of tests, with more than 800 of the 5,000 volts we applied. This model is also usually more expensive than most of the small portable options we have tried.
Fail to meet the standard
(TLP1208TELTV) and
In our test, the passing voltage was more than twice higher than those of the models.
Great
Offering an auto-shutdown mechanism, a lifetime warranty and four USB ports, this is more than any other small portable option we have seen. But we found that its pass voltage ratio
. In addition, we believe that its built-in phone holder is not attractive or practical.
with
Almost the same: both have four rotating sockets, which are perfect for large or oddly shaped plugs, and two USB-A ports. Their performance is also good, in our test, each person can only pass a voltage of about 290 volts. However, they are too large and bulky to be used for light trips or trips, and we believe that four sockets are not enough to accommodate bedside surge protectors.
Used to be our best choice for light travel, but it’s different from us
, It has no automatic shutdown function and no USB port. It is also very homely.
Used to be the first choice, but two less than our AC outlets
Is an older version
. When we tested them in previous years, the performance of both was worse than our current selection in terms of through voltage.
We tested
In the past few years, we believe that wall-mounted surge protectors have more than four sockets and are less safe than wired models. Since the six plugs and wires of these models are heavy, they can easily be pulled out of the wall (this may cause
).
We purchased the local Wal-Mart (
) Performed the last round of testing and failed at an alarming rate in almost all aspects.
We like the six high-current USB-A ports
, But we found that it didn’t slide neatly under the bedside table or under the bed like a more streamlined model like a bedside table or bed
It works well, but it's actually only useful for desks or workbenches-it has a desk clip, but no wall bracket, so it's impractical to place it on the ground. It is also very light and fragile.
very happy
There are four USB ports, while many other models have up to two. But in the test, we found that its penetration voltage is lower than the star type. In addition, its expandable USB hub function is difficult to manipulate, and not all useful functions (looks like a gi head), and there is no choice to wall-mount it on the wall.
In the past few years, we have also tested the APC
, with
And Belkin's
. None of them meet
or
In terms of surge protection, wire length, number of sockets or automatic shutdown.
In the past few years, the surge protection, power cord length and the number of sockets they provide have not been as good as
We were asked about AmazonBasics surge protectors, but we have not tested them because the products we saw do not have an automatic shutdown function. This means that once the protection device fails, your equipment will be vulnerable to surges, which defeats the purpose of buying a surge protector from the beginning.
Whether your surge protector is old or new, here are some basic guidelines to help you ensure that they are still effective:
Sarah Witman
Sarah Witman has been a staff writer for Wirecutter since 2017. She has been a science reporter for more than seven years, covering a wide range of topics from particle physics to satellite remote sensing. Since joining Wirecutter, she has researched, tested and written articles about surge protectors, mobile power supplies, laptop desks, mousetraps, etc.
after
Mark Smirniotis and Sarah Witman
The best power strip for travel in North America is cheap
(Aka
Adrienne Maxwell
Start your vinyl music journey with our selection of turntables, receivers, speakers, etc.
Kevin Purdy
We found this to be a way to make working at home easy and efficient. The only thing it doesn't do is prevent you from going to the kitchen.
Mark Smirniotis
We have spent hundreds of hours researching and testing office organization tools to help you keep your work area tidy.
Become friends!
You can
and also.
©
2021
Wirecutter, Inc.,
Product reviews, transactions and latest technology news
.
. Evil problem solver. Total number of writers.
. Enthusiastic player. Twitter's buff.
Bestgamingpro is made by
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the normal operation of the website. This category only contains cookies that ensure the basic functions and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that are not particularly necessary for the normal operation of the website. These cookies are specifically used to collect user personal data through analysis, advertising and other embedded content, and are called unnecessary cookies. You must obtain user consent before running these cookies on your website.
Wirecutter is supported by readers. When you make a purchase through a link on our website, we may receive a membership commission.
If you need a USB-C cable, then our existing options can meet your requirements. But we will introduce new options in early 2021, including longer options for people who want to charge 60 and 100w devices.
This
Longer than our current selection, but still provide the highest speed,
Same as our current selection, the price is half (worse the warranty), and
It is a 60W cable and charger.
your
guide
Share this comment
If your device has a USB-C port, for example
,
, Or
—You need some cables to charge, transfer data and display video. Unfortunately, as far as USB-C is concerned, even cables with the same appearance may show a big difference-cables that provide impressive fast charging may transfer data at an astonishingly slow speed, and vice versa . We have tested 68 cables and 16 adapters to make sure you can find the right cable for your needs and to help you find the best value for the cable that can accomplish all tasks.
This 6-foot cable is perfect for charging USB-C phones, tablets and laptops with up to 60 W chargers (basically all devices except 15-inch or 16-inch MacBook Pro), but only for USB 2.0 The data transmission speed is slower.
Supports USB 2.0 data transfer speed and supports up to 60 W of power (we confirmed this in our tests), which is required for charging USB-C mobile phones, USB-C tablets (including new USB-C tablets) All of
), and most 13-inch laptops. it is
, And backed by Anker's lifetime warranty. The 6-foot length allows you to charge while sitting on the sofa or bed.
As mentioned above, the data transfer speed of this cable is limited to USB 2.0, and large laptops (such as 15-inch or 16-inch MacBook Pro) cannot be charged at full speed. If you want to use a faster cable, you must give up some length or pay a certain fee.
. However, if all you need is an inexpensive and reliable cable that is long enough for your nightstand, then this fee is enough.
The 6.6-foot cable is rated at 100 W, and its performance is as good as Apple's MacBook Pro charging cable-at half the price.
This
Rated for 100 W charging, so you can charge laptops (such as 16-inch MacBook Pro),
,Full speed ahead. It has a height of 6.6 feet, which is as long as any cable we tested in this category. It has passed USB-IF certification and has a one-year warranty from a company we trust. Its performance is as good as Apple's
with
The MacBook Pro charging cable (not USB-IF certified) is half the price, and is usually a few dollars cheaper than the 60 W Anker charging cable we recommended above.
Like the 60 W Anker cable, this cable only supports USB 2.0 data transfer speeds. It is also thicker, more bulky, and the one-year warranty is not as useful as Anker's lifetime warranty.
If you need a cable that can do all the work, then this is the cable to get. It supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 transfer speed (up to 10 Gbps), and can charge any USB-C laptop or even a 16-inch MacBook Pro at full speed. However, charging a mobile phone is too much (and very short).
can do. Like all cables we consider for this category, it complies with the USB-C specification (cables that violate these specifications may
). As long as you use
, It supports up to 100 watts of charging, so any USB-C device (even a 16-inch MacBook Pro) can be charged at maximum speed. With USB 3.1 Gen 2 speeds of up to 10 Gbps, it can move data at the speeds currently allowed by non-Thunderbolt USB-C ports—fast enough to transfer data.
In about three seconds.
It is sturdy and durable, with convenient Velcro fasteners, and has a lifetime warranty from a company we trust. In addition, it has passed the USB-IF certification, which means that it complies with the
, This is a non-profit company operated by Apple, Intel, Microsoft and other technology giants.
It is more expensive than most USB-C cables, although most cheap cables either cannot transmit data at high speeds, or are not rated for 100 W charging, or have a shorter warranty. It is also only 3 feet long, but since you may be using this type of cable to connect your laptop to a storage drive, docking station or monitor, for example, it cannot be extended from the bedside table to the bedside, we don't think this is a big problem .
Few devices have the features of Thunderbolt 3, but if you need the highest data speed (up to 40 Gbps) and 100 W charging, this is the best cable we have found.
When charging at rated 100 W,
It can charge a 16-inch MacBook Pro or any high-power laptop. It has Thunderbolt 3 functionality, so although it looks like any other USB-C to USB-C cable (except for the Thunderbolt logo on both ends), it can still transfer data at 40 Gbps between supported devices.
In our data transmission test, we confirmed that the cable supports the highest speed when connected to our test SSD, which is an average of 2,131 MB/s read speed and 924 MB/s write speed (17.05 and 924 MB/s respectively) 7.39 Gbps).
-Make it as fast as anything else we tested. In addition, its 18-month warranty is the best we have seen in this category. When using it with non-Thunderbolt USB-C devices, it can be used as a USB-C cable that supports 100 W charging and USB 3.1 Gen 2 data transfer speed.
The Anker USB-C Thunderbolt cable is shorter than we want (almost any cable less than 3 feet long is a thorn for us), but in this case, there are practical reasons for this. Source, for example
According to reports, Thunderbolt 3 cables longer than 1.6 feet do not support the highest data transfer speeds unless you are willing to pay extra for a valid cable. And, since most people will use this device on a desktop computer (for example, connecting a laptop to a portable SSD next to the laptop), we think 1.6 feet is long enough.
This USB-A to USB-C cable transfers data at a snail's speed (USB 2.0), but its length is 6 feet, making it ideal for charging with older chargers and batteries.
If you want to connect a USB-C device (e.g.
Or a
) To the USB-A charging port (whether on a laptop like MacBook Air, or
or
, A
or
. This
It is USB-IF certified, has a lifetime warranty, and feels sturdy. We like that it is a relatively thin cable (even at 6 feet in length) that can be coiled compactly. In our tests, it can reach the full charging potential of 60 W, although this is an example of over-engineering-standard USB-A charging can reach up to 15 watts, even proprietary like QuickCharge powered by USB-A The charging standard will not exceed 20 W either.
Since the Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable only supports the highest USB 2.0 data transfer speed (480 Mbps), it is not the best choice for moving large amounts of data between devices. However, we were unable to find a faster cable that was USB-IF certified and was 6 feet or longer in length. It is not impossible to make such a cable. According to USB-IF, any length of USB-C cable can be certified as long as it passes all performance tests.
But since it must be a more powerful 5 amp cable, it may be larger than most people want. Anker’s sales representative told us that the company’s engineers found that a 6-foot cable with full USB 3.1 Gen 2 speed would be too thick. Until we connect with a USB-IF-certified cable that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 data transmission, is 6 feet or longer, we believe that Belkin (meeting the latter two standards) is your best choice for charging.
This USB-A to USB-C cable can be used both to transfer data and to charge from devices with older USB ports, but it is only 3 feet long.
It is suitable for transferring data from a USB-C mobile phone or storage device (such as a portable SSD) to a computer with a USB-A port, because it supports data transfer speeds of up to 10 Gbps. It is USB-IF certified, durable, and backed by Amazon's one-year warranty.
Since the cable is only 3 feet long, there is less flexibility for expansion throughout the workstation. However, to get a longer cable, you will have to sacrifice data transfer speed or
. Considering these limitations, AmazonBasics is the best choice for fast data transfer between USB-A and USB-C devices. If you want to use a longer cable for charging, please choose other products in this category,
.
This USB-A to USB-C adapter is the simplest and most powerful Nub-style model we have found.
Provides a simple (cheap) way to connect an existing USB-A cable to the USB-C port. If you bought a laptop without a USB-A port (such as a MacBook Pro), it feels good and you don’t want to immediately replace all the cables and flash drives you own. After testing these miniature adapters, we are confident that Aukey's adapter is the best. It has a 24-month warranty, and its size and shape make it easy to grasp for plugging and unplugging.
This model has not passed the USB-IF certification, but none of the similar products we have tested have passed. Otherwise, its performance will reach what we hope.
This is the best "short cable" USB-A to USB-C adapter we have tested.
If you prefer a short cable instead of a button adapter, please choose
. The advantage of the cable over the small piece is that it can move the connected USB-A cable or flash drive slightly away from the computer, in this case about 6 inches. The extra length and flexibility can simplify the use of certain accessories, especially those with grease plugs. The adapter has passed the USB-IF certification and performed well in our tests. It supports USB 3.1 Gen 1 (another term for USB 3.0) data transmission. It is the cheapest model we have tested.
Among any products we tested, AmazonBasics adapters have the shortest warranty period (one year). But beyond that, we have extensive experience in corporate customer service.
This 3-foot-long cable is compact and inexpensive, and has performed well in every test we conducted.
*At the time of publication, the price was
Seven dollars
Is a functional length (3 feet), usually used for charging
, An older Android phone, a wireless mouse or keyboard, or a pair
From the computer. it is at
The same is true for length, although we did not test it. In our test, it reached the speed of full charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, and it has a well-built slim design. It is also USB-IF certified and backed by Amazon's one-year warranty, which is about half the price of similar cables.
These cute little adapters allow you to charge USB-C devices using traditional Micro-USB cables.
Not much larger than your nails, but allows you to charge USB-C devices with a Micro-USB cable that you may already use. Because they are a bit larger than the other models we tested, it feels better to insert and unplug them. In our tests, these adapters performed second only to the second best adapters (
), and the 24-month warranty is the best of all such adapters we have considered.
We want the adapter to have USB-IF certification, but none of the companies we know bother to certify this accessory.
The cable is MFi certified, the sturdy shell can withstand frequent plugging and unplugging, and it has a compact structure that can be placed in a wallet or pocket.
$15
As sturdy as the shorter version, this MFi-certified cable is long enough to fit on your desk or bedside table.
Compared to the USB-A chargers and cables that come with most Apple devices, the USB-C to Lightning cable allows you to charge your iPhone (8 or 8 Plus or later) and most iPad Pros (not including charging via USB) The latest model) Charging-cat
When paired with a
Although our equipment does not allow us to test the internal functions of any USB-C to Lightning cable, we did conduct a direct comparison of many MFi certified options. we like
Best for charging anytime, anywhere, we prefer
Put it on your desk or bedside table.
Most importantly, the MFi certification status of Anker cables means that they meet Apple's requirements.
To ensure the best performance of the company's devices (from iPhone to Magic Trackpads) in terms of charging and data transfer functions.
Although you can buy unlicensed third-party options, we choose not to consider them. Since such models may not be fully compatible with Apple devices, you may run the risk of incorrect cable installation or overheating and damage the cable, the device, or both. Now that you have obtained a third-party cable licensed by MFi, you have no reason to consider using a third-party cable without a cable.
Both Anker cables have a lifetime warranty and Anker's excellent customer support. They are wrapped in a thick rubber sheath, but they are still flexible and compact enough to fit easily in a pocket or pouch, especially the 3-foot version. In addition, each cable is equipped with a convenient hook-and-loop cable tie to keep the cable coiled and prevent tangling.
Unlike Apple's cables, the plastic housing that connects the metal connector to the Anker PowerLine II cable looks sturdy and durable, and can withstand bending or abrasion even under regular use. Compared to most other cables we have tested, these cables make a satisfactory click when plugged into the USB-C port and have minimal wobble, ensuring a secure connection.
Apple’s official cables are available in 3.3-foot and 6.6-foot versions, so Anker’s 3-foot and 6-foot cables are shorter. But we think they are still long enough in most cases. Although Apple's cables are thinner and smaller than Anker PowerLine II cables, making them lighter, Apple cables are
-They don't have Anker's convenient hook and loop ties.
If you want a fast-charging Lightning cable that can span the entire room (and can withstand the apocalypse), then this is your best choice.
It's as fast as any other cable we've tested, and it's wrapped in the strongest sheath we've ever seen. The outer shell is made of thicker double-braided Kevlar, which seems less likely to wear or hook compared to the more common nylon materials. The plastic shell of the cable is sturdy, with few ridges along the collar, thereby increasing flexibility. It is also nearly 10 feet long and is the longest cable we have tested, allowing you to reach distant outlets more easily. Like Anker PowerLine II cables, Nomad is also MFi certified. Although its coverage does not match Anker's lifetime warranty, Nomad's five-year warranty is longer than most cables we have tested. Finally, the rubber cable ties that Nomad comes with are stronger than ever, and have thick ridges to close them, ensuring that your cables are coiled securely.
Since this cable is longer and stronger than other cables we have tested, it will be very bulky if you try to store it in a pocket or purse. However, if you plan to keep most of it in one place, or have enough room to store it in a school bag, the added volume of Nomad may not be too troublesome.
We do not recommend that you use the three-in-one cable of Micro-USB, USB-C and Lightning for daily use, but it is convenient when traveling.
Essentially, the 3-in-1 cable is a USB-A to Micro-USB cable with Lightning and USB-C adapters connected via a short tether. Although we do not recommend using such a cable every day because it is limited to slow charging and data speed, and the adapter can be troublesome, but we do think it can be convenient for travel, or as a spare device that can be placed in the desk drawer of your device .
Among those we have tried,
Is the clear winner. It has passed MFi certification, received the highest scores in our power consumption and data transmission tests (just like every triple cable we tested, it only supports USB 2.0 data speeds), and it seems to be doing a good job. This is a slim cable that is easy to roll up and fit in a bag, and its adapter is the easiest to insert and pull out, while the other adapters we tried were awkward and difficult to tangles. When we ran this model through Total Phase's Advanced Cable Tester, it was the only model we tested without some continuity, signal integrity, or DC resistance error. And it is backed by Anker's lifetime warranty.
In theory, using a three-in-one cable is a convenient and compact alternative to carrying three separate cables with you. But in practice, we found that they are very troublesome to use-an indecent way to solve different standards and traditional connectors. However, if you often use all three types (micro USB, USB-C, and Lightning) and hate to carry three different cables with you, then this is a good choice.
We hope that its rubber adapter tether is easier to handle and has a stronger structure-we are worried that they may break after repeated use-but none of the models we have tested impressed us in this regard. The cable's slim, compact design and good overall performance make it the best in the worst-case scenario.
It worked fine in our test, but got an F grade on Fakespot the last time I checked, and
Said it stopped working about after about
and
In terms of power consumption and data transfer speed, its performance is similar to the Anker PowerLine II USB-C to USB-C 2.0 cable, its plastic casing feels lighter, and the warranty period is shorter-compared to the service life, the validity period is one year.
It used to be our choice in this category, but unlike the Anker PowerLine II USB-C to USB-C 2.0 cable, it is not USB-IF certified.
In our power consumption test and data transmission test, its performance is roughly the same as that of the Anker PowerLine II USB-C to USB-C 2.0 cable, and it has a fairly good (five-year) warranty. However, we don't care about the ridges between the smooth and frosted parts of the cable casing (they don't feel good), and its price is usually more than double the price of all other cables we tested in this category.
Is a standard cable
This
. It looks good, but we did not test it because its cost is much higher than other competitors.
It is our predecessor choice in this category, but it has not passed the USB-IF certification. In addition, the cable problem USB-C to USB-C charging cable is only about half the price, and the price is just as good.
Launched in October 2018, its length is only half the length of the USB-C to USB-C charging cable, the price is twice that, and it is not USB-IF certified. Although its slim design makes it more compact and more portable than our choice,
Compared to the competition-it looks slim
And the reinforcement of the cuffs is less.
In our power consumption test and data transmission test, its performance is the same as that of USB-C to USB-C charging cables, and we like their luxurious appearance. However, neither of these two Moshi cables have passed the USB-IF certification, and the cost of each cable is much higher than the "cable problem".
It scored full marks in all our tests and was even longer than the Anker PowerLine II USB-C to USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 cable we chose at 3.3 feet. However, we don't like the rough texture of its plastic shell-we found them to be a bit clumsy overall-and its warranty (one year) does not meet Anker's lifetime warranty.
Slightly shorter than the Anker PowerLine II USB-C to USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 cable (2.3 feet to 3 feet), and only has a one-year warranty, while Anker provides a lifetime warranty.
In our test, its performance is similar to the Anker USB-C Thunderbolt cable, and both have a two-year warranty, while the Anker's warranty is 18 months. However, Anker's cables are more widely used, and we believe that the matte finish of its shell makes it look and feel more luxurious than the Belkin model.
In our test, its performance is not worse than the Anker USB-C Thunderbolt cable, but its warranty period is shorter (one year) and the cost is higher. In addition, according to such
, Any Thunderbolt 3 cable longer than 1.6 feet (such as 2.6 feet) cannot provide the highest speed.
Similar to the Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable, it has a long length (6 feet), is USB-IF certified, has performed well in our power consumption test, and can reach up to USB 2.0 speeds. However, unlike Belkin, its warranty period is very short, one year, and the case is lighter.
In this section, our previous selection
Because it did not pass the USB-IF certification, it was expelled in our latest round of testing. In contrast, AmazonBasics USB Type-C to USB Type-A cables and Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cables both have this certification and performed better or better than Anker in our tests.
The length is good, the look and feel are good; in our test, it also achieved a complete USB 3.1 Gen 2 data transfer speed (10 Gbps). However, in addition to not obtaining the USB-IF certification, the model is still lacking in our tests because the Total Phase Advanced Cable Tester reported DC resistance and signal integrity errors.
It is the longest cable we have tested in this category. Unfortunately, it is not USB-IF certified, only about 5 Gbps (USB 3.0 data transfer speed) in our test, and there are DC resistance and signal integrity errors when running through the Total Phase Advanced Cable Tester. . In addition, partly due to its impressive length, it is very bulky.
It performed well in our tests, and its braided cable makes it stronger than both the AmazonBasics USB Type-C to USB Type-A cable and Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable. But this is not USB-IF certified, as demonstrated by electrical engineer Lee Johnson
, We think that most people don’t need such a sturdy design.
In our power consumption test,
Excellent performance, and reached the complete USB 3.1 Gen 2 data transfer speed. But it has no USB-IF certification and is only 3.3 feet long. The Total Phase Advanced Cable Tester reported a signal integrity error in our test.
Similar to the Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable, but without USB-IF certification, the price is usually twice or three times that.
Construction quality
It’s really good: it’s very thin, it has a strain relief collar that prevents it from breaking over time, and it’s built-in
Keep the cable coiled when not in use. But it is not certified by USB-IF, can achieve the slowest (USB 2.0) data transfer speed, and is only 3.2 feet long-we can not find a cable that meets all three standards, but from AmazonBasics USB Type-C to USB -A cable and Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable both perform well in two of these three.
It performed well in our tests. It is also USB-IF certified to provide higher data transfer speeds with USB 3.1 Gen 2, has a lifetime warranty, and the price is only a fraction of the price of other USB 3.1 Gen 2 cables we tested. However, it does not have a particularly sturdy or streamlined design and can only be purchased on Monoprice's own website, which charges shipping fees. However, if these shortcomings do not bother you, it is a good choice for AmazonBasics USB Type C to USB Type A cables.
It has a good charging capacity in our test, is long (5 feet) in length, and is wrapped in beautiful woven fibers. However, it only has USB 2.0 data transfer speed and is not certified by USB-IF. This is also twice the amount of the AmazonBasics USB Type-C to USB Type-A cable and Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable.
It may be the most similar competitor to the Belkin USB-A to USB-C charging cable we tested: it is 6 feet long, is USB-IF certified, has won good results in our power consumption test, and only reaches USB 2.0 speed. However, although its price is similar to Belkin, it does not look so comfortable and it feels cheaper.
They perform well, but they are too fat and bulky, so it is basically impossible to install the two plugs side by side. with
Compared with other products we tested, it feels cheap.
Among
, with
, None of them have passed the USB-IF certification.
Is one of the top competitors in this category. Like our products, it supports USB 3.0 data transmission and has passed USB-IF certification. But its shell is larger than the AmazonBasics USB Type-C to USB 3.1 Gen 1 adapter, and it can be purchased exclusively on Monoprice's website, which has high shipping costs and is not so convenient for most people.
In our test, its performance is as good as the cable from AmazonBasics USB Type-C to Micro-B 2.0, and like the one we chose, it is USB-IF certified. It is 6 feet in length, which is also twice the length of our choice, and has a two-year warranty, which is twice the length of our choice. However, when we run it through the Total Phase Advanced Cable Tester, it has a DC resistance error. In addition, it is thicker and bulkier than AmazonBasics, and the price is about twice that.
It matches the Aukey CB-A2 Type C to Micro USB adapter in terms of price and performance, but we think its thinner design makes it harder to use and easier to lose. It also has an 18-month warranty, while Aukey's warranty is 24 months.
The power is only 2.3 watts, which is lower than the 7.4 watts we have seen from other tested models. We also believe that the built-in plastic ring and silver chain (designed to connect the adapter to the key ring) are impractical and sticky.
We tested 22 other USB-C to Lightning cables against our preferred product, but none of them had the same combination of product quality, price, length options, portability, and multi-year warranty that we offered. This group includes cables from EasyAcc, ESR, Griffin, Lecone, monCarbone, Ugreen and Xcentz, as well as the following cables:
although
, This
with
In most cases, our tests are comparable to the 3-foot-long Anker PowerLine II, and we believe that their housing is not as strong or easy to grip as Anker.
A little longer than the 6-foot Anker PowerLine II, which is good. But it is more expensive, and its shell is not as sturdy as the Anker cable.
As sturdy as the 3m (10ft) version. However, at a short length, it is not very useful for reaching remote sockets, and it is too large to be used for continuous charging.
Almost the same as the standard PowerLine II models, except that they have a double braided nylon sheath instead of a rubber sheath. We believe that different sheaths will not increase performance, and the price of these models is a few dollars higher, which is why we did not name them as the first choice. However, if you wish to use fabric sheaths (and don't want to increase the length or volume of Nomad), you should get them.
We fired
No testing is required because it is only available in one length (6 feet) and sheath (black and white nylon) configuration.
Second only to the Anker PowerLine II 3-in-1 cable. Like the Anker model, it is MFi certified, 3 feet long, and has a lifetime warranty. It has a slim, slim design that makes it both compact and easy to carry, which is the key, because we do recommend using the three-in-one cable only as a travel or spare option. We also believe that its adapter is the easiest to plug in and unplug the adapter we have tried. In our all-phase test, its decline was a series of errors (signal integrity and continuity), but our choice did not.
It has passed MFi certification and passed all our data transmission and power consumption tests, such as Anker PowerLine II 3-in-1 cable. It is almost 5 feet long, 2 feet longer than the Anker version, but still quite compact. Its woven fabric sheath and rubber cable holder are very nice. However, the plastic case of this cable is the worst case we have ever tried-plugging and unplugging them is like fighting a strong opponent. In addition, the Total Phase Advanced Cable Tester reported a DC resistance error.
Before starting the first round of testing in 2015, we consulted with Nathan K. (
At Google. He is an independent tester who worked with the famous Google engineer Benson Leung. He first discovered potential problems with USB-C accessories that did not meet the USB-C specification.
In the latest round of testing, we used
(A fancy set of equipment, worth $1,500) to check the wiring and signal integrity, DC resistance, and compliance with the USB-C specifications for each cable we tested. We also used it to check other data transfer speed and power consumption measurements again.
Test data transmission function
, We plug one end of each cable
(Not
, But still one of the fastest drives accessible via USB-C connection), plug in the other end
. Then, we ran a free system performance application called
Measure the read and write speed in MB/s (megabytes per second) on a laptop. To test the power consumption, we used a 13-inch laptop,
, And the first generation of Google Pixel, we noticed the maximum power consumption reading in the system report of the ammeter and notebook computer.
Test data transmission capability
, We plug one end of each cable into Samsung T3 and the other end
And run AJA System Test Lite. To test the power consumption, we used a 15-inch laptop, an ammeter and
, And recorded the maximum power consumption reading in the ammeter and the notebook computer system report.
(Desktop solid state drive with Thunderbolt 3 port), plug in a 13-inch MacBook at the other end, and run AJA System Test Lite. To test the power consumption, we used a 13-inch laptop, an ammeter and
, And recorded the maximum power consumption reading in the ammeter and the notebook computer system report. To test
, We use the same method, but use Samsung T3 instead of LaCie Bolt3.
Test data transmission capability
, We plug the USB-C end into the 13-inch laptop, and the USB-A end into
. Then, we plug the adapter into Samsung T3 and run AJA System Test Lite. To test the power consumption, we used an ammeter, pixels and one of our favorite travel sizes
(This
), and write down the maximum power consumption reading on the ammeter.
To test
, We plug the USB-C end into a 13-inch laptop, and insert the USB-A end into the SanDisk Extreme CZ80 16GB USB 3.0 flash drive, and run AJA System Test Lite. To test
We plugged the Micro-USB end into our favorite
(Anker's
) And Anker PowerPort II. Then, we plug the USB-C end into the ammeter and the Pixel, and note the maximum power consumption reading on the ammeter.
According to our
In the past few years, we have sent more than 70 cables to a former NASA engineer, who took them apart to inspect their internal components. We have learned that there is almost no difference in their charging or data transmission functions. So, to test
, We mainly focus on the manufacturing quality of the sheath and the shell, and ensure that the metal connector is tightly attached to the corresponding port.
In each test we conduct, we take three measurements for each cable (with the cable unplugged between the two measurements), and then calculate the average. After collecting data from all competitors, we considered other factors (USB-IF and MFi certification, length, price, availability, brand reputation, warranty and customer support, ease of use, packageability and aesthetics) to do so Make the final decision.
We are rewriting our guide to
, We will add a new USB-C to the Micro-USB cable connector: 3 feet
. We will update this guide with complete test instructions as soon as possible.
We are interested in testing more 10-foot-long USB-C cables because most of our choices are 6-foot-long or shorter. We are also interested in testing active Thunderbolt 3 cables longer than 1.6 feet. If we find any models worth buying, we will update this guide.
We have no plans to test an adapter that connects wired headphones to the USB-C port, but some of our employees like
, Which is relatively cheap.
We were asked about USB-C extension cables (e.g.
), but we don’t have one because the USB-C specification does not allow them to be used. In order for such a cable to work properly, it (and your other cables or connectors) will need to use a thicker power cord, which makes the cable thicker, harder to bend, and expensive. However, if there are any changes, we will pay close attention to this category and update this guide.
We also do not recommend any adapters designed to add MagSafe-like functions to existing USB-C charging cables. Like many MagSafe supporters, we were disappointed when Apple started phasing out this feature a few years ago. However, we believe that since the advent of later adapters (such as Griffin and Leonis), companies such as Griffin and Leonis have not successfully expanded the golden age of MagSafe. Those we have seen are not Elegant, when the cable is disconnected, a little (or not so little) nodules will stick out on the side of the laptop. We are waiting for more reliable and stylish versions of these adapters to surface before proceeding to them test.
If you can’t find what you are looking for here, please check out our rest of the best guides
Sarah Witman
Sarah Witman has been a staff writer for Wirecutter since 2017. She has been a science reporter for more than seven years, covering a wide range of topics from particle physics to satellite remote sensing. Since joining Wirecutter, she has researched, tested and written articles about surge protectors, mobile power supplies, laptop desks, mousetraps, etc.
after
Nathan Edwards
We have tested the best cables, hubs and dongles to help you connect all peripherals to your new laptop, even if the laptop only has a USB-C port.
Nick Gay
The best alternative to the original charger is
. It is cheap and small, but powerful and reliable.
Our cable and adapter recommendations will help you connect your new USB-C portable computer to any monitor or projector that has VGA, DVI, DisplayPort or HDMI ports.
No matter what kind of USB-powered devices you use, we choose to power them with the fastest charging speed.
Become friends!
You can
and also.
©
2021
Wirecutter, Inc.,
Product reviews, transactions and latest technology news
.
. Evil problem solver. Total number of writers.
. Enthusiastic player. Twitter's buff.
Bestgamingpro is made by
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the normal operation of the website. This category only contains cookies that ensure the basic functions and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that are not particularly necessary for the normal operation of the website. These cookies are specifically used to collect user personal data through analysis, advertising and other embedded content, and are called unnecessary cookies. You must obtain user consent before running these cookies on your website.
Product reviews, transactions and latest technology news
.
. Evil problem solver. Total number of writers.
. Enthusiastic player. Twitter's buff.
Bestgamingpro is made by
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the normal operation of the website. This category only contains cookies that ensure the basic functions and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that are not particularly necessary for the normal operation of the website. These cookies are specifically used to collect user personal data through analysis, advertising and other embedded content, and are called unnecessary cookies. You must obtain user consent before running these cookies on your website.